Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1363

reference
197-tree-1
name
1363
tree-preservation-order

undefined

197-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027360 50.864974)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027289 50.864966,-1.027292 50.864980,-1.027302 50.864993,-1.027317 50.865003,-1.027337 50.865010,-1.027359 50.865012,-1.027381 50.865010,-1.027401 50.865004,-1.027417 50.864994,-1.027427 50.864981,-1.027431 50.864968,-1.027428 50.864954,-1.027418 50.864941,-1.027402 50.864931,-1.027383 50.864924,-1.027361 50.864922,-1.027339 50.864924,-1.027319 50.864930,-1.027303 50.864940,-1.027292 50.864952,-1.027289 50.864966)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL